Should socrates have broken the law and left prison

Did we then not bring you into the world? Now if the premisses from which Woozley begins his argument are correct, then, it may be, his case is pretty watertight. He has a great deal of money and people would think poorly of him if he did not assist Socrates.

For decades before his trial, Socrates had carried out his stinging duties on a daily basis. Although Socrates lived and died several centuries before the Christian era, his position in this respect was similar to what later came to be known as the Christian view, which forbids one to overcome evil with evil but states rather that evil should be overcome with good.

Posts about well-trod issues e. People in no way interested in philosophy know that the great Socrates had a bitter spouse who caused him great suffering. If these offers of assistance are not sufficient to persuade Socrates to attempt an escape from prison, Crito presents some additional reasons in support of what he has been urging him to do.

Socrates should have drank the hemlock

Socrates and Crito are agreed that the issue must be settled on moral grounds. It is less obvious why Athenians found Socrates guilty, and what it might mean today. This writer has heard these arguments at a trial in Brisk.

But though the laws are not people either, if we ignore the personification of the present passage, there is no difficulty in representing damage to the laws as damage to the people whose laws they are. Crito explained that his coming at so early an hour was due to his belief that the time was short and if any action was to be taken it must be done at once.

This personification of the State, or what is sometimes referred to as the Laws, is an artistic device that brings home to the imagination in a powerful way the message that Socrates has been trying to convey.

An alternative interpretation of the dialectic is that it is a method for direct perception of the Form of the Good. He lists four reasons with which Crito backs up his appeal.

Any other kind of harm could properly be treated as insignificant by comparison with the moral damage to both Socrates and his friends which the attempt to escape would bring with it. He asked one question after another, and it soon seemed that the subject was far from simple, and actually quite complicated.

Crito explains that he has considerable means himself, all of which he would gladly use for any purpose that would aid in saving the life of Socrates. To return evil for evil may be in harmony with the morality of the many, but as he has indicated before, public opinion when not supported by good reasons is never a safe guide to follow.

The defense asked the question: For Socrates the only consideration is whether or not he would be doing the right thing by leaving.

Singer is referring to the Brest trials of October — Januarywhich he covered for the Yiddish press, in which opposition politicians were accused of planning an anti-government coup and sentenced to prison or forced to emigrate.

If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. The reasoning behind this was that technically they didn't kill him, he died of natural causes.

He liked to observe that successful fathers such as the prominent military general Pericles did not produce sons of their own quality. Socrates accepted the guilty verdict as binding, and drank the hemlock, because he acknowledged the authority of the court and the laws under which he was tried.

Besides, who would refuse this offer? One could ask Socrates: Socrates is not disturbed by this fact, for he believes that death is not necessarily an evil thing. Collective security or individual life? Nothing that Socrates says has any tendency to show that his own act of disobedience would in the slightest degree promote such general anarchy; and there is no sign in his speeches of any 'principle of fairness' which, so Woozley argues, is necessary for any inference from 'x is wrong when done wholesale, because it would be socially destructive' to 'x is wrong in the single case, even if it would not be socially destructive'.

Socrates – The philosopher of Justice

Then, too, he is betraying the members of his own family, especially the children, who are entitled to the nurture, guidance, and education that he could provide by staying alive and doing what is within his power for their welfare.All lawmakers have the feeling that their laws are final, that this law should never be broken.

This writer has heard these arguments at a trial in Brisk. [1] The dictator of Poland, Pilsudski, had accused a number of Polish politicians in court and charged them with trying to violate his dictatorship.

For instance, those who prosecuted and convicted Socrates have left no testament. Historians therefore face the challenge of reconciling the various evidence from the extant texts in order to attempt an accurate and consistent account of Socrates's life and work.

They concern the reasons which Socrates puts forward in the latter part of the dialogue (50 ff.)2 why a man should always obey the law, and specifically why Socrates, at the present time, should not disobey the law by trying to escape from prison. Socrates: Should he have escaped prison?

September 14, In issue 4, he argues that he made a decision to stay when he could have left, implying that he was a free agent with a choice in the matter. does this not mean that the law has broken the agreement? And if the agreement is broken by one party, is the other party not then.

Socrates (/ ˈ s ɒ k r ə t iː z /; Ancient Greek: Σωκρᾰ́της, translit. Sōkrátēs, [sɔːkrátɛːs]; c. – BC) was a classical Greek philosopher credited as one of the founders of Western philosophy, and as being the first moral philosopher, of the Western ethical tradition of thought.

An enigmatic figure, he made no writings, and is known chiefly through the accounts. In the Crito, Socrates is in prison awaiting execution for impiety and corrupting the youth. His impiety was judged to be a matter of questioning and possibly disbelieving the traditional gods, and his corrupting the youth was a matter of his teaching them to do the same.

Crito arrives at the prison.

Should socrates have broken the law and left prison
Rated 4/5 based on 32 review